Article
citation information:
Harkat,
I., Boumezbeur, I., Gattuso, D., Allioua,
M., Benzagouta, Y.N., Seghiri,
M., Farah, M.I., Keddari, D. Perception of
transport-territory and transport-city analysis: strategies for Mediterranean
cities in Algeria and Italy. Scientific
Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport. 2026, 130, 91-110. ISSN: 0209-3324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2026.130.6
Imane HARKAT[1],
Insaf BOUMEZBEUR[2],
Domenico GATTUSO[3],
Meriem ALLIOUA[4],
Yasser Nassim BENZAGOUTA[5],
Meriem SEGHIRI[6],
Mohamed Ikbal FARAH[7],
Dounia KEDDARI[8]
PERCEPTION OF
TRANSPORT-TERRITORY AND TRANSPORT-CITY ANALYSIS: STRATEGIES FOR MEDITERRANEAN
CITIES IN ALGERIA AND ITALY
Summary. The transport sector is
a crucial lever for economic, social, and territorial development, playing a
key role in regional integration and population mobility. In Algeria,
significant efforts are underway to modernize transport infrastructure. These
initiatives address the challenges of rapid urbanization and growing demand for
mobility, while promoting ecological and sustainable solutions. At the same
time, Italy, with its advanced infrastructure, is focusing on sustainability
and innovation to modernize an already well-developed transport network,
including metros, streetcars, high-speed trains, and freeways. The two
countries illustrate complementary dynamics: Algeria is undertaking ambitious
projects to address existing gaps, while Italy is adapting its infrastructure
to contemporary challenges such as managing urban congestion and upgrading
aging assets. Finally, sustainability and social equity lie at the core of
transport policies in both Algeria and Italy, with accessible and environmentally
friendly solutions aimed at reducing social inequalities and promoting more livable cities. These efforts reflect a transition toward
transport systems that support a resilient and environmentally sustainable
future.
Keywords: Mediterranean, sustainable development, transport/territory, city,
tramway
1. INTRODUCTION
Transportation
plays a fundamental role in a country’s development, as it is closely linked to
economic growth, mobility, trade dynamism, and regional integration. An
efficient and well-developed transport system – including roads, railways,
ports, and airports – stimulates trade, reduces regional disparities, improves
access to essential services such as healthcare and education, and attracts
foreign investment.
By
facilitating the rapid movement of goods and raw materials, transport supports
production and connects local, regional, and global markets. Investment in this
sector generates both direct employment (construction and infrastructure
management) and indirect jobs (trade and tourism), thereby contributing to
economic expansion and local business development, particularly in rural areas.
Moreover, well-structured networks connect producers to markets, enhance
exports, ease the import of raw materials, and ensure reliable distribution
nationwide. Seaports and airports play a strategic role in global trade, while
rail and road systems strengthen domestic connectivity and territorial
cohesion.
Beyond
its economic impact, transport enhances citizens’ mobility by improving access
to employment, education, healthcare, and other essential services. This
contributes to higher productivity, poverty reduction, improved quality of
life, and overall well-being. Modern and sustainable transport networks also
help reduce pollution and promote more livable
cities. Furthermore, efficient logistics corridors, modern airports, and
high-speed rail systems strengthen a country’s attractiveness to investors and
tourists, reinforcing its position in the global economy.
Within
the broader framework of sustainable development, transportation has become a
key strategic sector. However, mobility policies vary according to available
resources and institutional capacity. This article presents a comparative
analysis of two Mediterranean countries – Algeria and Italy – with particular
attention to urban public transport.
The
study adopts a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach to examine urban
transport systems in both countries, highlighting their similarities,
differences, challenges, and opportunities. It assesses the impact of public
transport policies – especially tramway systems – while identifying
country-specific dynamics. Through thematic analysis, quantitative data
evaluation, and comparative assessment, the research identifies convergences
and divergences and proposes strategic recommendations for more effective and
sustainable transport policies.
The
analysis first reviews national transport strategies, then compares Algeria and
Italy through planning documents addressing governmental approaches, urban
development policies, public transport systems, and the urban planning –
transport relationship. A focused case study on tramway policies is
subsequently presented, followed by concluding remarks contributing to the
broader academic discussion.
2. DATA AND METHODS
The study employs a mixed-methods approach,
combining quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare urban transport
systems in Algeria and Italy, with a focus on tramways.
Collected data:
·
Quantitative: urban
population, density, registered vehicles, tramway network characteristics
(length, number of lines, vehicles, capacity), annual public transport
ridership.
·
Qualitative: urban and
transport policy documents, mobility plans, feasibility studies, and academic
literature on sustainable mobility, equity, and smart cities.
Processing and
normalization:
·
Indicators standardized for comparison (network km
per inhabitant, inhabitant-to-tram ratios, passengers per year).
·
Geographical verification using Google Earth for
network accuracy and extensions.
Analyses performed:
·
Descriptive statistics and ratios to compare network
scale and efficiency.
·
Comparative analysis between Algeria and Italy on
coverage, fleet size, and tramway usage.
·
Case study approach on tramway development,
integrating policy, technological innovations (ITS, electronic ticketing), and
sustainability aspects.
·
Mapping and visualization for spatial analysis.
This methodology
allows the evaluation of both the quantitative performance of
transport systems and the political, social, and technological context shaping
their development.
3. GENERAL TRANSPORT/TERRITORY STRATEGIES.
URBAN MOBILITY.
Urban development policies in many
cities have increasingly emphasized urban regeneration (UR) initiatives over
the past few decades. These initiatives aim to rehabilitate more or less
extensive sectors of urban areas, including run-down neighborhoods,
disused industrial zones, anonymous suburbs, and areas characterized by
dilapidated buildings and infrastructure.
Mobility issues play a crucial role
in this context, as redefining cities involves making choices that facilitate
social interaction, improve accessibility for all citizens – particularly
people with reduced mobility – and limit the negative impacts of traffic
congestion. However, transport planning and urban planning are often treated
separately, which can lead to suboptimal outcomes.
Consequently, there is a growing
tendency to promote integrated land-use and transport planning, drawing on
advanced urban governance practices and innovative solutions such as
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS), active mobility, public transport (PT) technologies,
and shared mobility.
Over time, cities have faced
profound social and economic changes that have led to the redevelopment or
regeneration of existing urban areas in order to adapt the built environment to
contemporary community needs. Following the post-war reconstruction period
(1939-1945), urban development often proceeded in an uncontrolled manner,
resulting in the extensive expansion of the urban fabric across territories.
From the 1970s onward, however, a new planning vision began to emerge.
During the 1980s, a perspective of
sustainable and intelligent development took shape. Sustainable development was
formally defined in the 1987 Brundtland Report of the World Commission on
Environment and Development, Our Common Future, as “development that
meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs.” Since then, sustainable development has
become an increasingly influential paradigm, aiming to balance economic growth with
social equity and environmental protection. In 2001, the European Union adopted
a strategy for sustainable development, which was revised in 2006 and “sets out
a long-term vision of sustainability, in which economic growth, social
cohesion, and environmental protection go hand in hand and are mutually
supportive.”
Around 2010, it was increasingly
recognized that sustainable urban development could be supported by the
diffusion of digital technologies and technological innovation, particularly
Internet of Things (IoT) technologies. This recognition gave rise to the Smart
City concept, defined as a city capable of ensuring a high quality of life for
its citizens through the use of integrated and connected technological
solutions, while remaining sustainable, high-performing, and innovative [1-18].
In 2017, the International WELL
Building Institute introduced a protocol aimed at identifying levels of
collective well-being, known as the WELL Community Standard. This benchmark
seeks to improve the quality of life through construction practices, urban
design, and the regeneration of the urban fabric at the neighborhood
scale. It defines strategies addressing specific aspects of community health
and well-being, with mobility identified as one of the ten action areas,
placing particular emphasis on local relationships.
In recent years, alongside
environmental sustainability, the concept of social equity has gained
increasing attention. Litman provided an overview of key equity concepts in
transport and proposed a methodological framework for integrating equity
objectives and evaluating their impacts [13]. He distinguished between
different types of equity, notably horizontal equity – where individuals with
similar needs and abilities are treated similarly – and vertical equity, which
requires more favorable treatment for disadvantaged
groups.
Sustainable mobility refers to all
modes of transport that meet current travel needs while minimizing their
environmental, social, and economic impacts.
Strengthening public transport
services remains one of the most critical measures for promoting sustainable
mobility. This applies particularly to transport modes with dedicated or
protected lanes, such as high-service-level buses, tramways, metros, and cable
transport systems, as well as innovative technologies including Intelligent
Transport Systems (ITS), assisted and autonomous driving, information systems,
and artificial intelligence.
4. URBAN TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES.
COMPARISON ALGERIA/ITALY.
Algeria and Italy lie on opposite
sides of the Mediterranean and present distinct contexts in terms of urban
development, road infrastructure, and economic dynamism. Urban transport
development strategies differ considerably between Algeria, a developing
country, and Italy, an industrialized European nation. These differences
reflect variations in economic priorities, existing infrastructure, population
needs, and environmental constraints.
Algeria’s road network spans
approximately 130,000 km, including the East-West Freeway, a flagship project
linking the country’s main regions and facilitating economic exchanges [5,
12-25]. Nevertheless, some infrastructures still suffer from inadequate maintenance,
and rural areas remain relatively isolated. The state is striving to address
these disparities through substantial investments in roads, rail networks, and
public transport projects, such as tramways and the Algiers metro, aimed at
decongesting urban centers and reducing pollution
[4].
Italy, by contrast, has a mature
economy and a rich historical heritage. Its road infrastructure and urban
development are among the most advanced in Europe. Major cities such as Milan,
Rome, and Naples feature sophisticated transport networks, including metros,
streetcars, and electric buses. Italy’s motorway network, approximately 7,000
km long, is densely interconnected and well-maintained, promoting both national
and international connectivity. The country also has an extensive railroad
network and has developed high-speed train services. However, challenges
remain, including the management of aging infrastructure – particularly in
southern regions – and urban congestion in major cities. Italy is increasingly
focusing on smart and sustainable solutions to address environmental challenges
while maintaining the attractiveness of its cities for both residents and
tourists.
These two countries illustrate
complementary approaches to infrastructure development and urban management:
Algeria is focusing on filling its gaps through modern and ambitious projects,
while Italy relies on a well-established network that it continues to adapt to
contemporary challenges.
Several relevant research questions
arise:
These questions explore how a
rethought and modernized transport sector can act as a driver of positive
change. By fostering an ecological transition, it not only reduces negative
impacts but also actively builds a cleaner, fairer, and more resilient future
for generations to come. Placing sustainability at the core of transport
policies can simultaneously strengthen social equity. Accessible solutions,
such as electric buses or car-sharing schemes, enable all citizens – including
disadvantaged populations – to benefit from reliable and affordable
transportation.
4.1. Historical notes on the development of
cities and transport
In the late 19th and early 20th
centuries, Algeria’s transport networks were modernized with the introduction
of electric tramways, notably in Algiers in 1898, making it one of the first
cities in Africa to adopt this innovative mode of transport [17]. The system
was gradually extended to other major cities such as Oran and Constantine,
improving urban mobility but primarily serving European districts, while areas
inhabited by the local population remained underprovided. After independence,
Algeria experienced rapid urbanization: from an urban population of 2.5 million
in 1954, largely concentrated in coastal cities, the country progressively
shifted toward an urban majority driven by rural exodus, agrarian reforms, and
industrialization (Fig. 1).
Since the early 2000s, sustained
demographic growth and the sharp increase in the vehicle fleet have profoundly
reshaped Algerian cities, intensifying congestion and pressure on
infrastructure [9]. For decades, urban transport was not treated as a national
priority, but around the turn of the century authorities began recognizing its
strategic importance. With the urban population reaching approximately 35
million by 2024 – around 75% of the total population – major modernization
efforts have been undertaken, including the reintroduction of tramways, the
expansion of the Algiers metro, the development of cable cars, and improvements
to bus networks [16]. These initiatives mark a significant phase in the
transformation of urban mobility in Algeria.
Fig. 1. Urbanization rate in Algeria, 1954-2024
[2]
Rapid urbanization in Algeria has
deepened disparities between major metropolitan areas, equipped with relatively
modern infrastructure, and secondary cities that struggle to meet growing
demand. At the same time, massive motorization has generated severe congestion,
as outdated road networks are unable to absorb rising traffic volumes, leading
to chronic delays and declining quality of life. For nearly four decades after
independence, the absence of major mass transit projects such as metros or
tramways – despite sustained demographic growth – worsened urban mobility
challenges, particularly in large cities like Algiers. This inertia, shaped by
economic priorities and financial and organizational constraints, ultimately
underscored the urgent need to rethink mobility policies, prompting ambitious
transport modernization initiatives from the 2000s onward, including the launch
of the Algiers metro and the introduction of tramway systems in several major
cities [4].
From the 1970s onward, Italy – like
other Western European countries – experienced a crisis of the Fordist model
based on mass industrial production, which weakened the traditional link
between industrialization and urbanization. This transformation led to
productive decentralization, with the rise of small and medium-sized
enterprises and industrial districts across the country, reorganizing Italy
into a system of widespread and interconnected urban networks – often described
as the “Italy of 100 cities.” Intermediate towns regained economic vitality,
contributing to territorial balance and the global success of Made in Italy
[2-15].
By the 1990s, tertiarization accelerated as employment shifted from
manufacturing to services, and urban development became increasingly defined by
flows of goods, people, and information, reinforcing the role of cities as
dynamic nodes within national and global networks.
Italy’s settlement system is highly
diversified across its 7,919 municipalities and can be grouped into four main
categories: a large number of small communes with fewer than 5,000 inhabitants;
a limited number of expanding metropolitan areas such as Rome, Milan, Turin,
Naples, Florence and Bologna; around 100 medium-sized provincial capitals
(50,000-200,000 inhabitants), often facing demographic decline; and
approximately 3,000 communes with 5,000-20,000 inhabitants, many integrated
into dynamic industrial and tertiary districts. Medium-sized towns differ in
structure and function, ranging from compact urban centers
that act as territorial hubs to multipolar systems forming conurbations, where
networks of services and economic activities extend across interconnected urban
areas.
In contrast, Italy’s inland and
mountainous areas have experienced long-term demographic decline and
socio-economic weakening since the mid-20th century, marked by population
aging, reduced public services, limited accessibility, and infrastructure deterioration.
4.2. Urban transport development
Urban mobility has become a critical
issue in Algeria due to rapid urbanization and a population projected to reach
35 million by 2024, placing growing pressure on cities like Algiers, Oran, and
Constantine. Rising traffic congestion, inadequate infrastructure, and
sometimes inefficient transport systems are impacting both citizens’ quality of
life and the economic competitiveness of urban areas. In response, the
government has increasingly prioritized the development of sustainable, modern,
and inclusive mobility, investing since the 2000s in major projects such as the
Algiers metro, tramway networks across several cities, and expanded urban bus
services managed by public operators like the Establishment of Urban and
Suburban Transport in Algeria and Constantine.
As of December 2020, Algeria’s
motorization had reached 7.7 million registered vehicles, reflecting the
country’s rapid urbanization, growing mobility needs, and expanding economic
activities [17]. The market is dominated by used vehicles, preferred due to
high costs and import restrictions, while only 140,000 new vehicles were
registered in 2020. This situation highlights critical challenges, including
the need to modernize the vehicle fleet, improve road infrastructure, regulate
the automotive market, and develop sustainable public transport solutions to
reduce congestion and environmental impacts. Without restrictions, the national
car fleet could have reached an estimated 20 million vehicles by 2025,
illustrating the rising demand for individual mobility among an increasingly
urbanized population [19].
In response, Algeria has invested
heavily in public transport modernization, particularly in major cities such as
Algiers, Oran, and Constantine. Initiatives include the construction of new
metro lines, the extension of tramway networks, and the renovation of cable car
and gondola systems. Since the inauguration of the first tramways between 2011
and 2013, numerous expansion projects have been planned to connect more
districts and improve urban mobility. These efforts aim not only to alleviate
congestion but also to promote environmentally friendly transport, reduce
dependence on private cars, and enhance the quality of urban life.
In Italy, despite policies
supporting public transport, smart working, and non-motorized mobility, travel
remains costly, with households spending an average of 3,000 euros per year on
mobility in 2021, about 10% of total expenditures [14]. The car remains the
dominant mode of transport, accounting for over half of intra-municipal trips
and up to 85% of extra-urban journeys, while walking and cycling cover just
under 40% of local trips. Italy also has the highest car ownership rate in the
EU, with 694 cars per 1,000 inhabitants in 2023, though Italians drive fewer kilometers annually (around 11,000 km) and tend to keep
older vehicles, leading to environmental and social challenges related to an
aging fleet [20].
European and national authorities
have prioritized three main strategies for sustainable urban mobility:
promoting active mobility through cycle paths, pedestrian zones, and green
spaces; encouraging low-pollution and shared private mobility, including car-sharing,
bike-sharing, car-pooling, micro-electric vehicles, and personal mobility
devices; and strengthening public transport by modernizing fleets with
eco-friendly vehicles, expanding networks – especially exclusive right-of-way
lines – and upgrading infrastructure to meet advanced European standards,
supported by sufficient funding European [10, 11].
4.3. Urban public transport development
Urban transport in Algeria has
developed dynamically over the past decade to meet growing mobility demands
amid rapid urbanization, with major cities diversifying public transport
options to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. Algiers is the only city
with a modern metro, inaugurated in 2011, providing a fast and efficient
alternative to heavy traffic, while tramways – also introduced in 2011 and now
operating in seven cities – offer sustainable, structured mobility that reduces
congestion and emissions. Buses remain the most widely used mode, though often
criticized for irregularity and aging fleets. Despite these advances, Algeria’s
metro and tramway networks remain limited compared with regional and
international standards, highlighting the need for further infrastructure
expansion to meet urban transport demands effectively.
Despite having a relatively
developed rail network, Algeria lags behind its North African neighbors in passenger transport, with 5 billion passenger-kilometers in 2023 compared to 9 billion in Morocco
and 6 billion in Tunisia. Urban mobility is dominated by buses, which account
for over 65% of trips, while tramways across major cities cover 94 km and carry
about 40 million passengers annually. The Algiers metro, with 18.2 km of track,
serves around 40,000 passengers per day, demonstrating both the potential and
the current limitations of rail-based transport in meeting the country’s urban
mobility needs.
Italy’s urban public transport
network, while extensive, remains smaller than those of major European
countries [22]. The metro spans about 240 km, tramways 342 km, and suburban
railroads 672 km, all below the lengths found in Germany, France, the UK, and
Spain. Rail accounts for only 36.4% of passenger-kilometers,
compared with over 50% in leading European nations. Despite being the fourth
largest public transport sector in Europe, with sales exceeding 12 billion
euros, Italy still lags behind Germany, France, and the UK, both in network
size and in passenger usage.
The sector is highly fragmented,
comprising around 930 companies employing 124,000 people, with public operators
dominating services and market share. Publicly owned companies, though only 12%
of the total, account for 83% of passenger journeys and 85% of sales. Revenues
from traffic cover only a minority of income, while public subsidies remain the
primary source, averaging 55% of production value.
5. CASE STUDY: TRAMWAYS
The rapid and extensive introduction
of tramways in Algeria is part of a dynamic similar to that observed in many
other countries over the last three decades. This phenomenon reflects a desire
to modernize urban transport systems in response to major challenges such as
decongesting city centers, reducing pollutant
emissions, and improving citizens' quality of life.
Following the inauguration of the
first tramway lines in the country’s three main cities – Algiers, Oran, and
Constantine – between 2011 and 2013, the development of Algeria’s tramway
network has gained considerable momentum. These initial projects marked a key
milestone, illustrating the authorities’ determination to transform urban
mobility systems over the long term. Building on this early success, no fewer
than 15 new projects have been studied nationwide, reflecting the ambition to
make this modern, environmentally friendly mode of transport widely available
and adapted to the challenges of large conurbations. These studies target
cities with high population growth or urban density, aiming to relieve
congestion on road networks, enhance citizens’ quality of life, and meet rising
mobility needs while reducing the environmental footprint (Tab. 1). This
dynamic positions Algeria among developing countries rapidly adopting modern
infrastructures to meet the demands of the 21st century.
Tab. 1
Provision of tramway networks in
Algeria by 2023
|
CITIES |
Population (inhab.) |
Surface Area (km²) |
Density (inhab/km²) |
Network L. (km) |
Allocation km/10000 |
Vehicles (N.) |
Allocation inhab/veh |
|
Algiers |
3,500,000 |
363 |
9,642 |
23.2 |
0.07 |
48 |
72,917 |
|
Oran |
1,500,000 |
250 |
6,000 |
18.7 |
0.12 |
30 |
50,000 |
|
Constantine |
450,000 |
231 |
1,948 |
18.5 |
0.41 |
27 |
16,667 |
|
Sétif |
300,000 |
127 |
2,362 |
22.4 |
0.75 |
47 |
6,383 |
|
Sidi Bel Abbès |
210,000 |
49 |
4,285 |
13.8 |
0.66 |
30 |
7,000 |
|
Mostaganem |
160,000 |
100 |
1,600 |
14.2 |
0.89 |
25 |
6,400 |
|
Ouargla |
150,000 |
133 |
1,127 |
9.7 |
0.65 |
23 |
6,522 |
|
TOTAL |
6,270,000 |
1,253 |
5,004 |
120.5 |
0.19 |
230 |
27,260 |
By 2023, Algeria will have seven
fully operational urban tramway networks across several major cities. These
modern infrastructures represent a significant step forward in transforming the
public transport landscape, addressing the growing need for mobility in the
context of rapid urbanization. The networks, located in Algiers, Oran,
Constantine, Sidi Bel Abbès, Ouargla, Mostaganem, and Sétif, reflect
the authorities’ commitment to diversifying transport options while promoting
sustainable and environmentally friendly solutions.
By 2023, Algeria will have seven operational urban tramway networks across several major cities (Tab. 2 and Fig. 2). These modern infrastructures represent a significant step forward in transforming the public transport landscape, addressing the growing need for mobility in a context of rapid urbanization. The modern tramway lines already in operation include:
·
Algiers (May 2011): The capital was the
first city to reintroduce the tramway, a flagship project designed to relieve
urban traffic congestion and provide a modern, environmentally friendly
alternative for getting around the city.
·
Oran (May 2011): The country’s
second-largest city launched its own tramway network in 2011, linking the main
residential and commercial areas. It will be Algeria’s longest tramway, with
nearly 50 km of tracks and 75 stations.
·
Constantine (July 2013): The historic city
of Constantine inaugurated its tramway in 2013, improving traffic flow in a
city with complex topography.
·
Sidi Bel Abbès (July 2017): This
northwestern city launched its tramway network in 2017, strengthening the
region’s transport infrastructure.
·
Ouargla (March 2018): Located in the south
of the country, Ouargla integrated a tramway into its urban infrastructure in
2018, marking a major step in the city’s development.
·
Sétif (May 2018): The city of Sétif
inaugurated its tramway in May 2018, providing a modern mobility solution amid
rapid demographic growth.
·
Mostaganem (February 2023): The tramway
network was recently extended to Mostaganem in February 2023, demonstrating the
government’s ongoing commitment to modernizing public transport infrastructure
in Algerian cities.
Tab.
2
Tramway
networks in Algeria, 2024 [3-7]
|
CITIES |
Commissioning |
Length (km) |
Stations N. |
Rames N. |
Capacity (steps/day) |
Extensions (dates) |
Length (km) |
|
Alger |
05-2011 |
7,2 |
38 |
48+4 |
185 000 |
2012, 2015 |
23,2 |
|
Oran |
05-2013 |
18,7 |
32 |
30+4 |
120 000 |
|
|
|
Constantine |
07-2013 |
8,1 |
15 |
27+20 |
80 000 |
2019, 2021 |
14,7 |
|
Sidi-Bel-Abbès |
07-2017 |
13,7 |
22 |
30 |
70 000 |
|
|
|
Sétif |
05-2018 |
22,4 |
26 |
34 |
75 000 |
|
|
|
Ouargla |
03-2018 |
9,7 |
16 |
23 |
45 000 |
|
|
|
Mostaganem |
2021 |
14,2 |
24 |
25 |
60 000 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
94,0 |
173 |
245 |
|
|
37,9 |
By 2023, the Algerian tramway fleet
will total 221 units, all built to the standard 2.65 m gauge (Fig. 3). This
gauge ensures technical uniformity and facilitates interoperability, as well as
maintenance of the vehicles. The fleet serves several cities across the
country, reflecting Algeria’s efforts to modernize and expand public transport
networks to meet the growing demand for urban mobility. This development also
demonstrates the country’s commitment to sustainable and environmentally
friendly transport solutions.
The trainsets were produced by the
Algerian Industrial Transport Company, a joint venture between Alstom, the
National Railway Transport Company, Ferrovial, and the Algiers Metro Company,
with the exception of some units manufactured at Alstom’s Spanish plant near
Barcelona. The Algerian Industrial Transport Company assembles the components
supplied by Alstom at its European Citadis production
sites (Tab. 3).
Tab. 3
Characteristics of trams in Algerian
cities
|
CITIES |
Nb Lines |
Type of line |
Operator |
Opening |
Length (km) |
Gauge (mm) |
Site Type |
|
Alger |
1 |
Tram |
SETRAM* |
2011 |
23.2 |
1,435 |
Dedicated site |
|
Oran |
1 |
Tram |
SETRAM |
2013 |
18.7 |
1,435 |
Dedicated
site |
|
Constantine |
1 |
Tram |
SETRAM |
2013 |
14.7 |
1,435 |
Dedicated site |
|
Sidi Bel Abbès |
1 |
Tram |
SETRAM |
2017 |
13.7 |
1,435 |
Dedicated
site |
|
Sétif |
2 |
Tram |
SETRAM |
2018 |
22.4 |
1,435 |
Dedicated site |
|
Ouargla |
1 |
Tram |
SETRAM |
2018 |
9.7 |
1,435 |
Dedicated
site |
|
Mostaganem |
2 |
Tram |
SETRAM |
2023 |
14.2 |
1,435 |
Dedicated site |
|
TOTAL |
9 |
116.6 |
*SETRAM: Tramway Exploitation Company
Fig. 2. Development of metro and tramway lines
in Algeria
[3], Google Earth, Map processing by author
Building on this initial success, no
fewer than 15 new projects have been studied across the country, reflecting the
national ambition to make this modern, environmentally friendly mode of
transport widely available and adapted to the challenges of major conurbations.
Feasibility studies were launched in
2024 for the construction of tramway lines in 12 towns: Béchar,
Béjaïa, Biskra, Blida, Chlef,
Djelfa, Jijel, Mascara, M'Sila, Relizane, Skikda, and Souk-Ahras. In
addition, two projects originally launched in 2015 and suspended in 2020 – Batna and Annaba – were relaunched in 2024. Nevertheless,
there is often a gap between intentions and reality. Expansion and
modernization projects are ongoing to improve the efficiency and sustainability
of the transport system.
Italy currently has 48 tramway lines
in operation, with a total length of 386.6 km. Overall, the construction of
urban rail networks for mass rapid transit (trams and metros) has largely been
at a standstill since 2015, with the exception of a few short new sections
[24]. Table 4 presents data on tram infrastructure in Italian cities. The
information below is drawn from various sources, notably the Mobility Maps of
operating companies and the Urban Travel Plans of the cities concerned.
Fig. 3. Existing Tramway Lines in Algeria by
2024 [6]
Tab. 4
Characteristics of trams in Italian
cities
|
CITIES |
Nb |
Type of line |
Operator1 |
Opening |
Length (km) |
Gauge (mm) |
Location |
|
Milan |
17 |
Tram |
ATM |
1881 |
157,0 |
1.445 |
Clean site |
|
Turin |
8 |
Tram |
GTT |
1871 |
84,0 |
1.445 |
Clean site |
|
Rome |
6 |
Tram |
ATAC |
1887 |
32,0 |
1.445 |
Clean site |
|
Palermo |
4 |
Tram |
AMAT |
2015 |
18,3 |
1.435 |
Reserved site |
|
Venice |
2 |
Tyre-Guided tram |
ACTV |
2010 |
20,0 |
- |
Clean site |
|
Florence |
2 |
Tram |
GEST |
2010 |
17,0 |
1.435 |
Reserved site |
|
Bergamo |
1 |
Metro / Fast tram |
TEB |
2009 |
12,5 |
1.435 |
Reserved site |
|
Cagliari |
2 |
Metro / Fast
tram |
ARST |
2008 |
12,0 |
950 |
Reserved site |
|
Naples |
3 |
Tram |
ANM |
1875 |
11,8 |
1.435 |
Clean site |
|
Padova |
1 |
Tyre-Guided tram |
Busitalia V. |
2007 |
10,0 |
- |
Clean site |
|
Messina |
1 |
Tram |
ATM |
2003 |
7,7 |
1.445 |
Reserved site |
|
Sassari |
1 |
Tram |
ARST |
2006 |
4,3 |
950 |
Clean site |
|
TOTAL |
48 |
|
|
|
386,6 |
|
|
Note
(Operator)
Abbreviat
Full Name
Explanation
ATM Azienda Trasporti Milanesi Milan Transport Company
GTT Gruppo Torinese Trasporti Turin Transport Group
ATAC Azienda per la mobilità di Roma Capitale Rome Capital Mobility Company
AMAT Azienda Municipalizzata Auto Trasporti Municipal Transport Company (Palermo)
ACTV Azienda del Consorzio Trasporti Veneziano Venice Transport Consortium Company
GEST Gestione Servizi Trasporti Transport Services Management (Trieste)
TEB Tranvie Elettriche Biellesi Biella Electric Tramways
ARST Azienda Regionale Sarda Trasporti Sardinian Regional Transport Company
ANM Azienda Napoletana Mobilità Naples Mobility Company
Busitalia V. Busitalia Veneto Veneto Busitalia (part of the FS Group)
Figure 5 shows the existing tramway
networks in six Italian cities in 2023.
Table 5 presents data on the average equipment of these cities in terms of
tramway network length and the number of operational vehicles. The total length
of each tram network is calculated as the sum of all active lines. In the case
of Milan, where some lines extend into surrounding municipalities (Rozzano,
line 15; Cinisello B. and Sesto S.G., line 31), these extensions are included
in the calculations.
Fig. 4. Italian cities planned to be equipped
with tramways by 2026
Tab. 5
Provision of tramway networks in
Italy by 2023
|
CITIES |
Population (inhab) |
Surface area (km2) |
Density (inhab/km2) |
NetworkL (km) |
Allocations km/10000 average |
Medium km/Km2 |
Vehicles N. |
Allocation inhab/veh |
|
Milan |
1.488.132 |
206,6 |
10.921 |
157,0 |
1,10 |
0,76 |
477 |
3.120 |
|
Turin |
846.926 |
130,1 |
6.509 |
84,0 |
0,99 |
0,65 |
189 |
4.481 |
|
Rome |
2.754.719 |
1.286,7 |
2.141 |
32,0 |
0,12 |
0,03 |
164 |
16.797 |
|
Palermo |
628.894 |
160,1 |
3.927 |
18,3 |
0,37 |
0,15 |
17 |
36.994 |
|
Venice |
250.369 |
417,6 |
600 |
20,0 |
0,79 |
0,05 |
20 |
12.518 |
|
Florence |
363.837 |
102,2 |
3.560 |
17,0 |
0,46 |
0,17 |
46 |
7.910 |
|
Bergamo |
120.504 |
40,2 |
2.995 |
12,5 |
1,00 |
0,31 |
14 |
8.607 |
|
Cagliari |
147.378 |
83,6 |
1.764 |
12,0 |
0,81 |
0,14 |
12 |
12.282 |
|
Naples |
911.697 |
116,7 |
7.811 |
11,8 |
0,13 |
0,10 |
37 |
24.640 |
|
Padova |
207.301 |
93,0 |
2.229 |
10,5 |
0,51 |
0,11 |
22 |
9.423 |
|
Messina |
217.895 |
212,2 |
1.027 |
7,7 |
0,35 |
0,04 |
15 |
14.526 |
|
Sassari |
120.875 |
546,6 |
221 |
4,3 |
0,36 |
0,01 |
4 |
30.219 |
|
TOTAL |
8.058.527 |
3.396 |
2.373 |
386,6 |
0,48 |
0,12 |
1.017 |
7.923 |
Fig. 5. Map of the tramway networks in Milan,
Turin, Florence, Cagliari, Venice and Rome
Italy’s tramway network spans 386.6
km across 12 cities, with 58 urban lines and 1,170 stations served by 1,017
vehicles. Ten lines are rail-based, and two are rubber-tyred, with about 10%
operating on exclusive right-of-way (Tab. 6). Track gauges vary from 950 to
1,445 mm, and average commercial speeds range from 9 to 18 km/h. Service
frequency typically reaches 4-8 vehicles per hour during peak times and 2-6
vehicles per hour off-peak, while line capacity varies widely, from 360
passengers per hour on low-demand lines to 3,600 on heavily used routes.
Tram Stadler
Rail Tram Hitachi
Rail Tram Bombardier Cityrunner
Tram Light Rail Type 4 Tram AB Sirio Tram Škoda 06 T ForCity
Tram CAF Urbos Tram
Peter Witt Serie 2800
Tram
FIAT Cityway Tram Light Rail
Vehicle Standard Type 3
Fig. 6. Tram vehicles in Italy
Tab. 6
Tram vehicles in Italy. 2022
|
Cities |
Lines |
Number of stops |
Capacity (passengers/vehicle) |
Frequency (trams per hour) |
Line capacity (passengers/hour) |
|
Milan |
1 |
35 |
130 |
8 |
1.040 |
|
2 |
29 |
175 |
15 |
2.625 |
|
|
3 |
25 |
262 |
6 |
1.572 |
|
|
4 |
22 |
285 |
6 |
1.710 |
|
|
5 |
29 |
130 |
7 |
910 |
|
|
7 |
21 |
285 |
4 |
1.140 |
|
|
9 |
27 |
206 |
3 |
618 |
|
|
10 |
35 |
130 |
3 |
390 |
|
|
12 |
37 |
270 |
2 |
540 |
|
|
14 |
46 |
285 |
2 |
570 |
|
|
15 |
32 |
270 |
10 |
2.700 |
|
|
16 |
37 |
270 |
2 |
540 |
|
|
19 |
43 |
130 |
8 |
1.040 |
|
|
24 |
18 |
270 |
5 |
1.350 |
|
|
27 |
23 |
270 |
5 |
1.350 |
|
|
31 |
27 |
285 |
4 |
1.140 |
|
|
33 |
23 |
130 |
7 |
910 |
|
|
Turin |
3 |
26 |
200 |
3 |
600 |
|
4 |
33 |
200 |
12 |
2.400 |
|
|
9 |
26 |
200 |
7 |
1.400 |
|
|
10 |
24 |
200 |
10 |
2.000 |
|
|
13 |
20 |
200 |
7 |
1.400 |
|
|
15 |
39 |
200 |
8 |
1.600 |
|
|
16CD |
26 |
200 |
7 |
1.400 |
|
|
16CS |
15 |
200 |
7 |
1.400 |
|
|
Rome |
2 |
29 |
240 |
12 |
2.880 |
|
3L |
21 |
240 |
15 |
3.600 |
|
|
5 |
24 |
240 |
10 |
2.400 |
|
|
8 |
31 |
240 |
15 |
960 |
|
|
14 |
22 |
240 |
8 |
1.920 |
|
|
19L |
20 |
240 |
12 |
2.880 |
|
|
Palermo |
1 |
15 |
188 |
12 |
2.256 |
|
2 |
13 |
188 |
6 |
1.128 |
|
|
3 |
12 |
188 |
6 |
1.128 |
|
|
4 |
22 |
188 |
5 |
940 |
|
|
Venice |
1 |
23 |
282 |
12 |
3.384 |
|
2 |
17 |
282 |
8 |
2.256 |
|
|
Florence |
T1 |
24 |
188 |
15 |
2.820 |
|
T2 |
26 |
188 |
15 |
2.820 |
|
|
Bergamo |
T1 |
16 |
188 |
4 |
752 |
|
Cagliari |
1 |
11 |
266 |
6 |
1.596 |
|
2 |
5 |
266 |
3 |
798 |
|
|
Naples |
412 |
22 |
188 |
3 |
564 |
|
421 |
32 |
188 |
3 |
564 |
|
|
422 |
16 |
188 |
3 |
564 |
|
|
Padova |
SIR1 |
25 |
164 |
10 |
1.640 |
|
Messina |
1 |
18 |
180 |
2 |
360 |
|
Sassari |
1 |
8 |
200 |
3 |
600 |
|
GLOBAL |
48 |
1.170 |
191 |
- |
- |
The number of passengers on the
public transport network was increasing before the COVID-19 period; it declined
during the pandemic years, but the trend has resumed (Tab. 7), and significant
growth is expected following the network expansion and improvements in service
provision.
Italian authorities are planning a
major expansion of tramway networks and public transport to modernize
infrastructure and reduce the gap with leading European countries [20]. As of
October 2024, projects include new and extended lines in cities such as
Bologna, Milan, Bergamo, Padua, Florence, and Cagliari, supported by roughly
1.9 billion euros from the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (Tab. 8). The
national tramway network is expected to grow from 386.6 km to 475.6 km, with
long-term plans targeting around 800 km within ten years. Rome is a focal
point, where seven new lines will expand the network from 32 km to 101.2 km.
Tab. 7
Public Transport Passengers per Year
(in millions), 2017-2022
|
Cities |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
|
Milan |
652.350 |
685.150 |
747.915 |
301.162 |
354.231 |
490.696 |
|
Turin |
283.196 |
280.867 |
287.000 |
194.581 |
143.330 |
224.000 |
|
Rome |
952.861 |
911.000 |
895.415 |
427.000 |
444.000 |
607.359 |
|
Palermo |
28.400 |
27.000 |
25.162 |
9.436 |
6.462 |
28.000 |
|
Venice |
215.200 |
215.630 |
218.900 |
125.500 |
145.790 |
171.080 |
|
Florence |
94.000 |
114.634 |
112.371 |
87.700 |
91.208 |
92.149 |
|
Bergamo |
21.087 |
21.500 |
27.964 |
21.611 |
21.162 |
22.700 |
|
Cagliari |
24.402 |
25.000 |
32.000 |
25.787 |
22.469 |
23.730 |
|
Naples |
109.000 |
130.158 |
114.092 |
35.900 |
42.920 |
59.600 |
|
Padova |
26.663 |
27.383 |
27.913 |
15.501 |
14.475 |
18.872 |
|
Messina |
10.956 |
11.417 |
12.523 |
7.864 |
2.280 |
5.318 |
|
Sassari |
12.150 |
11.241 |
12.000 |
8.695 |
12.018 |
15.122 |
|
TOTAL |
2.430.265 |
2.460.980 |
2.513.255 |
1.260.737 |
1.300.345 |
1.758.626 |
Tab. 8
New projects financed by the National Recovery
and Resilience Plan
|
CITIES |
New actions |
L (km) |
National Recovery and Resilience Plan (M€) |
|
Bergamo |
Line T2 |
9.8 |
50.0 |
|
Bologna |
Red
line |
15.0 |
151.02 |
|
Green line |
6.2 |
222.1 |
|
|
Florence |
Line
3 extension |
5.0 |
222.5 |
|
Line 4 extension |
7.2 |
150.0 |
|
|
Milan |
Express
tram (northern districts) |
3.0 |
50.3 |
|
Line 7 extension |
1.2 |
36.0 |
|
|
Naples |
Network
extension |
1.3 |
5.7 |
|
Tram
line S.Giovanni-Piazza Sannazaro |
2.8 |
17.0 |
|
|
Padova |
Line
SIR 2 |
17.5 |
238.1 |
|
Palermo |
Network extensions and purchase of trains |
19.7 |
504.4 |
|
Rome |
Termini-Vaticano-Aurelio
line (1st section) |
2.2 |
120.0 |
|
Togliatti line |
8.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
89.0 |
1,867.12 |
6. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION
Traffic issues in Algeria’s and
Italy’s fast-growing cities call for innovative and sustainable mobility
strategies to address the challenges of rapid urbanization, population growth,
and economic development. Existing transport infrastructures are under
considerable pressure, resulting in severe road congestion, extended travel
times, frequent delays, and increased air pollution, all of which negatively
impact citizens’ quality of life and hinder economic and social activities.
Addressing these issues requires a transition toward more sustainable and
innovative mobility solutions, including the reconfiguration of transport modes
to meet rising demand while minimizing environmental impacts.
A priority approach involves the
strengthening and expansion of public transport networks, such as metros,
streetcars, high-speed trains, cable cars, and gondolas, which provide
efficient, rapid, and less-polluting alternatives for urban mobility. The integration
of advanced technologies, including electronic ticketing systems and mobile
transport applications, enhances efficiency by managing passenger flows,
offering real-time information, and facilitating seamless multimodal journeys.
Complementary strategies, such as promoting active mobility through walking and
cycling and providing safe, accessible infrastructure, further reduce
dependence on private vehicles while encouraging environmentally friendly
transport habits.
Coordination and integration between
different transport modes are essential to an efficient urban mobility system.
Well-designed multimodal networks connecting buses, trams, metros, and active
mobility options optimize existing infrastructure, reduce congestion, and lower
pollutant emissions, creating healthier and more livable
urban environments. Public policy plays a central role in supporting these
measures, requiring substantial investment in modernizing infrastructure,
extending transport networks, adopting innovative technologies, and
implementing incentive schemes, such as subsidies for electric bicycles or
discounts on public transport. Awareness campaigns are also crucial to foster a
culture of sustainable mobility among citizens.
In conclusion, both Algeria and
Italy face urgent challenges in urban mobility that necessitate sustainable and
innovative solutions. Expansion of public transport, adoption of multimodal
approaches, integration of advanced technologies, and promotion of active
mobility provide viable strategies to improve efficiency, reduce environmental
impact, and enhance urban quality of life. While Algeria focuses on modernizing
and expanding its infrastructure, Italy emphasizes sustainability and
technological innovation; cooperation between the two could enable Algeria to
benefit from Italian experience while adapting solutions to its own context. By
investing in resilient, inclusive, and environmentally sustainable transport
systems, both countries can address current congestion and pollution issues
while laying the foundation for greener, more connected, and economically
competitive urban futures.
References
1.
Albino Vincenzo, Umberto Berardi, oberta
Maria Dangelico. 2015. „Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and
initiatives”. Journal of Urban Technology 22(1):
3-21.
2.
Algerian National Statistics Office.
„Annual report”. Algeria. 2023.
3.
Algiers Metro Company. „Annual Report”.
Algeria. 2024.
4.
Belhour Samir, Rachid Chaib, Redouane
Kahoul, Ioana Verzea. 2023. „For an effective disruptions management in rail
transport: Case study of the tramway of Constantine, Algeria”. Procedia
Structural Integrity 48: 288-295.
5.
Boudjeriou Mohamed, Abdelkader Kebiche.
2024. „The arrival of the tramway in Algeria: What impacts on the city? Case
studies of the Oran and Constantine tramways”. Prace i Studia Geograficzne
69(3): 45-63.
6.
Bourechrouche Meriem. „Map QGis”.
Territorial Planning Research Center. Constantine. Algeria. 2024.
7.
Cable Air Transport Company. „Annual
Report”. Algeria. 2024.
8.
The National Recovery and Resilience Plan.
„Annual Report”. Italy. 2024.
9.
Constantine wilaya transport department.
„Annual report”. 2023.
10.
European Union. „Communication from the
commission to the European parliament, the council,
the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions Sustainable and Smart Mobility
Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future”. 2020.
11.
European Union. „Communication from the
commission to the European parliament, the council,
the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions The New EU Urban Mobility
Framework”. 2021.
12.
Kebiche Abdelkader. 2017. „The Sétif
tramway: An opportunity to combine urban planning and mobility for a city
project”. Cahiers Géographiques de l’Ouest 12:
75-95.
13.
Litman Todd. 2022. Evaluating
transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in
transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI). Canada.
14.
Marinuzzi Giovanni, Walter Tortorella..
2019. „La mobilità delle città italiane”. [In Italian: “Mobility of Italian Cities”]. Rivista
Energia 4.
15.
Mascarucci Roberto2020. Città medie e metropoli regionali. [In Italian:
Medium-Sized Cities and Regional Metropolises]. In: Mascarucci R.,
Città medie e metropoli regionali. [In Italian: Medium-Sized Cities and Regional Metropolises]. ED.INU.
16.
Ministry of Transport Algeria. 2022.
„Algeria's transport sector: a review of activities”.
17.
Ministry of Transport Algeria. 2020.
„Transport action plan 2020-2024”.
18.
Murgante Bianca, Giuseppe Borruso. 2015.
„Cities and smartness: The true challenge”. International Journal of
Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems 6(4):
4-8.
19.
National Statistics Office. 2024. „Annual
report”. Algeria.
20.
Osservatorio sulla Mobilità Urbana
Sostenibile.
[In Italian: Observatory on Sustainable Urban
Mobility]. 2024.
Available at: https://italy.cleancitiescampaign.org.
21.
Pavia Roberto. 2010. Urban systems in
Italy. XXI secolo. Enciclopedia Treccani.
22.
Perretti Maria Elena, Chiara Dell’Aquila.
2019.
Lights and shadows of urban mobility in
Italy: Restarting from public transport. CDP Ricerca
& Studi.
23.
Potenziamento Arte Immagine. 2016. Transformations
of the city between the 19th and 20th centuries.
24.
Spinosa Alessandro. 2022. State of the art
of tram systems worldwide and future prospects. In:
IX
National Seminar on the Tram System: „Guided transport systems for
public transport and metropolitan areas”, Thematic Area 2: “Trams, metros,
and trains in urban and metropolitan areas” (5-6 October 2022). Ed. Ministry of
Infrastructure and Sustainable Mobility.
25.
Tabti-Talamali Abdelkader, Tahar Baouni.
2017. „The tramway at the heart of urban projects in the Algiers conurbation”. Cahiers
Géographiques de l'Ouest 8(1): 264-284.
Received 28.09.2025; accepted in revised form 24.02.2026
Scientific Journal of Silesian
University of Technology. Series Transport is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
[1]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: imane.harkat@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8070-3184
[2]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: insaf.boumezbeur@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-0849
[3]
Università Mediterranea de Reggio Calabria (I) - DICEAM, Italie. Email: domenico.gattuso@unirc.it. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-219X
[4]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: meriem.allioua@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-5304
[5]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: yasser.benzagouta@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4726-249X
[6]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: meriem.seghiri@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9374-2989
[7]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: mohamedikbal.farah@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6480-2301
[8]
Centre de Recherche en Aménagement du Territoire (CRAT), Campus Zouaghi
Slimane, Route de Ain el Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algérie. Email: dounia.keddari@crat.dz. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8631-7997