Article citation information:
Szczucka-Lasota,
B., Węgrzyn, T. Modern materials and innovative welding
technology used in the construction of antenna mounts. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series
Transport. 2022, 115, 175-182. ISSN:
0209-3324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2022.115.12.
Bożena SZCZUCKA-LASOTA[1],
Tomasz WĘGRZYN[2]
MODERN MATERIALS AND INNOVATIVE WELDING TECHNOLOGY USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION
OF ANTENNA MOUNTS
Summary. Telecommunication,
transport and civil engineering play an important role in new research areas.
New antennas based on innovative materials are being developed. At the same
time, the methods of antenna mounting with the use of high-strength materials
to ensure high structural rigidity with the lowest possible weight are being
planned. These materials include AHSS steels with ultimate tensile strength
(UTS) up to 1700 MPa and elevated yield point (YS); however, welded joints made
of these steels have much worse mechanical properties, compared to the native
materials. In this paper, it was planned to test the MAG welding of DOCOL 1400M
steel (AHSS group). Directly after welding, a micro-jet joint cooling was
applied. It was determined to create thin-walled joints that could be used in
the formation of antenna mounts.
Keywords: antenna
mounts, welding, smart city
1. INTRODUCTION
New
construction materials and welding technologies could play an important role in
smart city development. Antennas and infrared detectors and methods of fixing
them with thin-walled, high-strength welded structures will play a large role
in creating smart cities [1]. Recently, metamaterials emerged as a vital part
of the construction of antennas and infrared detectors. Advanced antennas are
being rapidly developed, operating on more progressive principles and
materials. Moreover, a tendency to create ever-lighter structures, both
regarding the main part of the antennas, as well as the methods of their
mounting, appears. Tripods and antenna mounting elements are made of
high-strength materials to reduce the weight of the antenna structure [2]. This
article presents the research results leading to the choice of the MAG welding
process for structures made of DOCOL 1400 intended for the construction of
antennas or infrared detectors [3].
DOCOL
1400 steels have become increasingly popular for various structures in civil
engineering and transport means due to their mechanical properties, especially with
a good yield point of over 1350 MPa [4-6]. Welding of AHSS steels is currently
checked in the industry for mechanical and tribological properties. The authors
focused on the unfavourable dominant martensitic structure, which will not
affect the good weldability of these steel grades [7-8].
Therefore,
it is recommended to apply preheating for DOCOL steel welding structures. The
heating is to dry out and remove any additional contaminants, ensuring a lack
of high hydrogen concentration in the weld, which is one of the factors
contributing to the formation of weld cracks and other defects and
non-conformities. Each structure has a different dimension,
especially the wall thickness. In thicker joints, chamfering is used, while
thinner structures are tried to be welded without chamfering. The most
appropriate welding conditions should be carefully selected for each type of
structure.
2.
RESEARCH MATERIALS
DOCOL
1400M steel should be treated as a difficult material to weld because its weld
is susceptible to welding cracks [6]. Table 1 presents some mechanical
properties of the tested material.
Tab.
1
DOCOL 1400M steel and its mechanical properties
YS, MPA |
UTS, MPa |
Relative elongation A5, % |
1155 |
1370 |
6.9 |
DOCOL 1400M steel has a clearly higher amount
of Ti and Al than the conventional unalloyed types of steel used in the
construction of lightweight structures. Noteworthy is also the low content of
sulfur and phosphorus in the material (Table 2) - such chemical composition of
the steel enables high strength of the structure.
To assess the
suitability of DOCOL 1400M steel for thin-walled antenna structures, a sheet of
1.8 mm thickness was tested. It was planned to create joints MAG (Metal Active
Gas) joints using a shielding gas mixture of 90% Ar+10% CO2. The
UNION X96 electrode wire was selected. The chemical composition of the UNION
X96 is provided in Table 3.
Tab.
2
DOCOL 1400 steel – chemical composition [7]
Steel grade |
C, % |
Si, % |
Mn, % |
P, % |
S, % |
Al, % |
Nb, % |
Ti, % |
DOCOL
1400M |
0.17 |
0.21 |
1.40 |
0.009 |
0.002 |
0.041 |
0.015 |
0.025 |
Tab.
3
Welding wire UNION X96 - composition [8]
C, % |
Si, % |
Mn, % |
P, % |
Cr, % |
Mo, % |
Ni, % |
Ti, % |
0.1 |
0.82 |
1.83 |
0.01 |
0.46 |
0.67 |
2.48 |
0.006 |
The composition of
the base material and wire was intentionally not exactly the same. Chromium
(which was not present in the parent material) was introduced into the
electrode wire to increase the strength of the joint, as well as nickel and
molybdenum (which also do not exist in the parent material) to correct the
plastic properties of a joint. The process parameters were rather typical:
• electrode wire
diameter: 1 mm,
• arc voltage:18.5
V,
• welding current
was at the level of 114 A,
• welding speed:
385 mm/min.
The weld had a
single-pass character, a forming ceramic pad was used. Joints were made both
without the use of preheating, as well as with preheating of 75°C. Other
welding parameters included:
• use of a direct
current source,
• shielding gas
flow: 14 l/min,
• the gap between
two edges: 0.8 mm,
• lack of bevelling.
The joints were made
with the MAG process using the application of micro-jet (mj) cooling.
The most important mj
cooling parameters included:
• cooling gas
selection: shielding gas: 90% Ar+10% CO2 (selected also to MAG
process),
• diameter of micro-nozzle injector: (60 µm; 70
µm),
• gas flow rate
(0.55 MPa; 0.65 MPa).
All samples selected
for the creation of welded joints had dimensions of 400 mm × 150 mm
× 1.8 mm. After the welding, samples for mechanical tests were made out
of them according to the relevant standards.
3.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
After the welding
process of thin-walled sheets used for antenna holders with application of MAG
and the shield, NDT tests (non-destructive) were carried out, which included:
• VT test (visual) test of the weld
performed (3× magnification) following the PN-EN ISO 17638 standard,
• MT test (magnetic particle) - following
the PN-EN ISO 17638 standard.
The results of the
NDT tests are shown in Table 4.
Tab.
4
Analysis of NDT tests
Type of process |
Micro-nozzle diameter, µm |
Gas flow rate, MPa |
Assessment of the joint quality |
MAG without cooling |
- |
- |
Cracks in the weld
and HAZ |
MAG without micro-jet cooling, with preheating
(75°C) |
- |
- |
Lack of cracks |
MAG with micro-jet-cooling, without preheating |
60 |
0.55 |
Cracks in the weld
and HAZ |
MAG with micro-jet-cooling, without preheating |
60 |
0.65 |
Lack of cracks |
MAG with micro-jet-cooling, without preheating |
70 |
0.55 |
Lack of cracks |
MAG with micro-jet-cooling, without preheating |
70 |
0.65 |
Cracks in the weld
and HAZ |
MAG with micro-jet cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
60 |
0.55 |
Lack of cracks |
MAG with micro-jet cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
60 |
0.65 |
Lack of cracks |
MAG with micro-jet cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
70 |
0.55 |
Lack of cracks |
MAG with micro-jet cooling with preheating (75°C) |
70 |
0.65 |
Cracks in the weld
and HAZ |
The presented data
shows that welding of DOCOL 1400M requires preheating in the classic MAG
process. No cracks were identified mostly in these joints and the HAZ (heat
affected zone) where micro-jet cooling was taken. Furthermore, it was observed
that too weak and too intense micro-jet cooling does not provide good quality
joints. The preheating temperature of 75°C was found to be correctly
selected. Only the connections made using the parameters supporting the
creation of joints without welding defects and non-conformities were considered
for further (destructive) tests (Table 4). Joints with obtained welding defects
have not been further investigated.
The next stage of the
research included mechanical tests. The immediate tensile strength of the
connections was tested using the INSTRON 3369 machine. The results of the
tensile strength (the average of 3 measurements) are shown in Table 5.
Tab.
5
Tensile strength results of DOCOL 1400M after welding with preheating
Type of MAG process |
Micro-nozzle diameter, µm |
Gas flow rate, MPa |
UTS, MPa |
YS, MPa |
Classic, without mj cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
- |
- |
796 |
489 |
with mj cooling, without preheating |
60 |
0.65 |
805 |
501 |
with mj cooling, without preheating |
70 |
0.55 |
811 |
512 |
with mj cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
60 |
0.55 |
836 |
527 |
with mj cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
60 |
0.65 |
846 |
531 |
with mj cooling, with preheating (75°C) |
70 |
0.55 |
831 |
521 |
High strength and
yield points were obtained in all the tested cases. It is important to note
that weld tensile strength is much lower than the mechanical properties of the
base material. The best properties have the joints obtained through welding
with the use of preheating and micro-jet cooling. The UTS of such joints is at
the level of around 830 MPa, and the YS about 520 MPa (the three last columns
in Table 4). The results of the tensile strength tests should be perceived as
positive based on their results it can be concluded that the DOCOL 1400M steel
might be used for thin-walled elements of antenna mounts.
A bending test was
executed, as the next point of the investigation, for all the joints that had
been previously tested in the strength test (presented in Table 4). The test was
realized with the EN ISO 5173 standard. Five measurements were taken for each
test. The root side and separately face side were verified. No cracks were
found in the weld and the HAZ, neither on the root nor the face sides. No
incompatibilities were detected in all the tested joints, which confirms that
DOCOL 1400M could be used for thin-walled elements of antenna mounts.
Next, the
microstructure analysis of the same joints tested for tensile strength and bend
tests was performed. The dominant martensitic structure was found in all the
cases. It was also noticed that MAG welding with micro-jet cooling produces a
slightly finer martensitic structure than the process without mj cooling. The
research was executed on transverse sections (PN-EN ISO 9015) using a Neophot
microscope. The structure of the weld, which allowed obtaining the highest
immediate tensile strength (UTS = 846 MPa), is shown in Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Weld microstructure of DOCOL 1400M steel
(joint made with preheating up to 75°C and with mj cooling) × 200
The final stage of
the tests included verification of the fatigue strength of the joint. For this
purpose, hourglass samples (Figure 2) were made for the joint that provided the
highest tensile strength of 846 MPa (Table 4, Figure 1). The hourglass type was
selected due to the weld location in the smallest cross-section of the
measuring base, which is the physical plane of destruction, regardless of the
type of mechanical test.
Fig. 2. Hourglass samples used for testing the fatigue strength
of the joint
The static and
fatigue tests were realized on the 8874 INSTRON machine. The fatigue test was
performed using a cyclically alternating stress signal with a sinusoidal
waveform. The following standard control signal parameters were used in the
fatigue test. Selected parameters of the tested connection made of DOCOL 1400M
steel after MAG welding fellfield with mj cooling are presented in Table 6.
Tab.
6
Selected parameters of the fatigue test of the tested joint
Maximum stress value [MPa] |
The number of cycles performed at each stage of the fatigue test |
Final result |
500 MPa |
1th stage: 623 710 |
positive |
2nd stage: 1 220 150 |
positive |
|
Total number of cycles |
1 843 860 |
crack in the sample in the centre of the measuring zone |
The joint fatigue
test of the value of the applied stress presented a crack at the number of load
cycles of 1 843 860 (Table 6), the second expected value for the steel fatigue
limit, which is 2×106. Based on this result, it can be concluded that at
a stress value slightly below 500 MPa, the material will have an infinite
fatigue life. The fatigue limit of the tested micro-weld joint was estimated at
the level of 490 MPa.
The positive results
of the joint fatigue strength tests show that the welded thin antenna structure
meets the safety requirements.
4.
CONCLUSION
The difficult-to-weld material proposed for mounting modern antennas
might be DOCOL 1400M (AHSS group). Tensile strength of base material is much
greater than weld. In this article, it was planned to create welds using two
processes (the classic MAG method and the method including micro-jet cooling)
to choose better welding parameters and to prove that DOCOL 1400M steel joints
can be proposed for the construction of thin-walled welded antenna structures
due to their good mechanical properties. First, thin-walled samples were
prepared, and the quality of the joints was made using various processes and
parameters were checked through non-destructive testing. The non-destructive
assessment shows that the best results are obtained after the welding where
preheating and micro-jet cooling were applied in the MAG process. The research
shows that to produce a good joint from DOCOL 1400M steel, preheating
(75°C) is required and micro-jet cooling is recommended. The influence of the
main mj cooling parameters on the mechanical properties of the joint was also
investigated. Temporary tensile strength and bending tests were performed, the
metallographic structure was analysed, and the fatigue strength of the joint
was determined. The use of micro-jet cooling helps to obtain higher yield points
and joint strength compared to the classic MAG process. Micro-jet cooling
allowed to receive a favourable fineness of the martensitic structure. The
fatigue strength tests show that the structure made simultaneously with the use
of preheating and mj cooling is safe as the proper fatigue limit of the tested
welds (490 MPa). The non-destructive tests proved that DOCOL 1400M steel is
correctly selected as the new material for the construction of thin-walled
welded antenna structures.
Acknowledgement
Special thanks: This article
is related to the implementation of the COST project, CA 18223.
References
1.
UNAVCO. “UNAVCO Resources: GNSS Antenna
Mounts”. Available at: https://kb.unavco.org/kb/article/unavco-resources-gnss-antenna-mounts-394.html.
2.
THALES. “Secure, sustainable smart cities and
the IoT”. Available at: https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/markets/digital-identity-and-security/iot/inspired/smart-cities
3.
Jaewson L., A. Kamran, P. Jwo. 2011. “Modeling
of failure mode of laser welds in lap-shear speciments of HSLA steel
sheets”. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 1: 347-396.
4.
Darabi J., Ekula K. “Development of a
chip-integrated micro cooling device”. Microelectronics Journal
34(11): 1067-1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2003.09.010.
5.
Hadryś D. “Impact load of welds after
micro-jet cooling”. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials 60(4):
2525-2528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amm-2015-0409.
6.
Muszynski T., D. Mikielewicz. “Structural
optimization of microjet array cooling system”. Applied Thermal
Engineering 123: 103-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.082.
7.
Celin R., J. Burja. “Effect of cooling rates on
the weld heat affected zone coarse grain microstructure”. Metallurgical
and Materials Engineering 24(1): 37-44.
8.
Walsh S.M., J.P. Smith, E.A. Browne, T.W. Hennighausen,
B.A. Malouin. 2018. “Practical Concerns for Adoption of Microjet
Cooling”. ASME Proceedings Power Electronics, Energy Conversion, and
Storage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPACK2018-8468
9.
Tarasiuk W., T. Szymczak, A. Borawski. 2020. “Investigation
of surface after erosion using optical profilometry technique”. Metrology
and Measurement Systems 27(2): 265-273. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2020.132773.
10. Tarasiuk W., K. Golak, Y. Tsybrii, O. Nosko. 2020. „Correlations
between the wear of car brake friction materials and airborne wear particle
emissions”. Wear 456-457: 203361.
Received 05.01.2022; accepted in
revised form 10.03.2022
Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series
Transport is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License
[1] Faculty of Transport and Aviation
Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Krasińskiego 8 Street,
40-019 Katowice, Poland. Email: bozena.szczucka-lasota@polsl.pl.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-1864
[2] Faculty of Transport and Aviation
Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Krasińskiego 8 Street,
40-019 Katowice, Poland. Email: tomasz_wegrzyn@polsl.pl. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-1032