Article citation information:

Šteininger, J., Hrček, S., Smetanka, L., Skyba, R. Optimisation procedure of inner geometry in spherical roller bearings with regard to their durability. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport. 2020, 106, 173-181. ISSN: 0209-3324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2020.106.15.

 

 

Ján ŠTEININGER[1], Slavomír HRČEK[2], Lukáš SMETANKA[3], Rudolf SKYBA[4]

 

 

 

OPTIMISATION PROCEDURE OF INNER GEOMETRY IN SPHERICAL ROLLER BEARINGS WITH REGARD TO
THEIR DURABILITY

 

Summary. This article deals with an optimisation procedure of inner geometry of rolling elements designed for spherical roller bearings. A process of selection of the most appropriate solution to increase spherical roller bearing durability is understood under the term optimisation in this case. The aim of this article is to examine the impact of a change of inner geometry on the durability and reliability of spherical roller bearings regarding production technology and competitiveness. Contact strain along with a spherical roller by means of Finite Element Method (FEM) in contact points of components of a spherical roller bearing by means of designed 3D parametric models. The most appropriate shape of inner geometry of a bearing from the standpoint of calculated durability will be determined based on the results of analyses.

Keywords: spherical roller bearing, rolling element, optimisation, contact strain

1. INTRODUCTION

 

Rolling bearings are an inseparable part of most machines and devices, in which takes place rotational movement or linear motion. There are different requirements on rolling bearings. Production machines need bearings, which are able to work in high revolution, in power engineering, bearings have to carry heavy loads, trains require bearings with high-speed performance, etc.

Development or rather rolling bearing optimisation is conditioned by an increase of technical parameters in machines and devices. This fact refers especially to an increase of input parameters such as power and revolution, weight and volume reduction, noise level reduction, etc. However, the most important parameters requiring optimisation are bearing lifetime and reliability.

The development of new technologies introduces also new construction materials, new production techniques of semi-finished products and bearing components or new installation methods. It is important not to overlook the bearing construction. Here, it is possible to perform geometry adjustment optimisation. This adjustment applies especially to geometry adjustment of runways and rolling elements in the spherical roller bearings.

 

 

2. SPHERICAL ROLLER BEARINGS DURABILITY

 

The double-row angular spherical roller bearing has a runway spherically ground on the outer ring. The bearing is able to accommodate very high radial loads, as well as heavy axial loads in both directions. High radial load capacity is caused by the great number of rolling elements, so-called spherical rollers and their close contact on the inner ring runways [2].

Rolling bearings durability depends on a revolution number which the bearing can perform until fatigue of any of their components takes place. A peeled material is a sign of component fatigue. Fatigue is a basic and natural way of bearing damage. It is demonstrated by the presence of small cracks under the bearing runway surface. The depth of these cracks is usually about 0.05 - 0.3 mm depending on the surface curve radiuses of rolling elements and the bearing rings runways. The crack depth allows the material changes which are caused by slide pulsing strain. This process leads to a gradual crack formation under the surface. It can take quite a long time before it is visible on the surface in the form of a peeled-off material, so-called pitting [1,6,7].

 

 

3. CONTACT STRAIN ALONG SPHERICAL ROLLER IN SPHERICAL ROLLER BEARING

 

It is possible to calculate the intensity of the contact pressure and the size of the contact surface - effective length lef and width 2b from the contact pressure distribution on the most strained point in the bearing inner ring. The picture (Fig. 1) shows the course projection (the curve) of the contact pressure along the contact surface lef of the contact ellipse on the bearing inner ring. The contact strain curve was calculated using the finite element method [5].

 

 

Fig. 1. The contact pressure course on the inner bearing ring runway

 

 

4. PREPARATION OF PARAMETRIC 3D MODEL AND CONTACT ANALYSIS

 

The double-row spherical roller bearing model (Fig. 2) has been simplified to the maximum extent due to the even load distribution on both rows and individual rolling elements. The model consists of the rolling element, the outer ring, the inner ring, and the contact surfaces. These surfaces are important for more precise model meshing in FEM system ANSYS. The contact pressure was measured in the above-mentioned parts [12].

 

 

Fig. 2. The simplified model of the double row spherical roller bearing

5. OPTIMISATION OF GEOMETRY OF SPHERICAL ROLLER BEARING

 

The aim of optimisation is a decrease of contact pressure that acts in the point of contact of the rolling element with the outer and inner ring. The profile of a rolling element will be optimised, and we also calculated the contact strain between rolling elements and bearing rings [10].

We designed three new geometries of the rolling element for spherical roller bearings that were consequently compared with the reference profile. A selection of the most appropriate design of the new geometry of the rolling element was based on a comparison of volumes of contact pressures of bearing runways of the inner and outer bearing rings.

The comparison of curves of contact pressures of rolling elements depends on the length of the contact surface lef. The pictures Fig. 3 (inner ring) and Fig. 4 (outer ring) show the curve shape. We reached a decrease of contact pressure on bearing runways of bearing rings in all designs of a new geometry of the rolling element [11].

As shown in Figs. 3 and 4, the lowest contact pressure acts between two bearing rings and the rolling element with new geometry 4. At the same time, contact pressure that acts between bearing rings and the rolling element does not produce maximum strain values that negatively affect bearing durability. The new geometry of the spherical roller bearing formed by the logarithmic curve is the most appropriate for optimisation of the spherical roller bearing regarding its durability and lifespan [9].

The evaluation and selection of the most appropriate design of the new geometry are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

 

 

Fig. 3. The comparison of contact pressure courses in the bearing runway of the inner ring of the spherical roller bearing of analysed geometries of the rolling element

 

Tab. 1

The evaluation of results of analyses in the inner ring of the spherical roller bearing

 

Design nr.

Title

lef [mm]

bef [mm]

po [MPa]

σmax [MPa]

Reference bearing

Profile

21

0.96

2106.1

1426

1

The change of the main radius

22.13

0.96

1921.5

1319.9

3

The combination of 2 radiuses

22.14

0.64

2106.1

1315.3

4

Logarithmic curve

21.9

0.63

1948.3

1302.6

 

 

 

Fig. 4. The comparison of contact pressure courses in the bearing runway of the outer ring of the spherical roller bearing of analysed geometries of the rolling element


Tab. 2

The evaluation of results of analyses in the outer ring of the spherical roller bearing

 

Design nr.

Title

lef [mm]

bef [mm]

po [MPa]

σmax [MPa]

Reference bearing

Profile

21.8

0.8

1758.4

1426

2

The change of the main radius

22.14

1.21

2048.7

1319.9

3

The combination of 2 radiuses

22.14

1.18

1719.7

1315.3

4

Logarithmic curve

22

0.64

1576.9

1302.6

 

For a better evaluation of analysed geometries, we calculated the durability of individually analysed geometries according to the Lundberg-Palmgren theory:

                
                                                            (1)

                                                           (2)

                                                             (3)

 

where  S is the probability of survival, N-  the number of load cycles, V- stressed volume, e, c, h, A- material constants defined by experiments, - pressure present in the contact point, 2b- the minor axis of the ellipse [12].

 

A calculation of a total lifetime of the bearing was based on partial lifetimes of bearing rings. As far as a logical comparison is concerned, 100 per cent lifetime is assigned to the reference geometry. A comparison of the calculated lifetimes of analysed geometries is shown in Fig. 5 [8].

 

 

5. CONCLUSIONS

 

Spherical roller bearings can be optimised by a modification of the geometry of the rolling element, that is, the spherical roller. The most appropriate geometry seems to be the one formed by the logarithmic curve after a comparison of lifetimes of the bearing with the new geometry of the rolling element (Fig. 5). The logarithmic curve is described by equations while in this case, a parameter of a loss of the logarithmic curve profile, that is, a modified surface of the spherical roller. The optimal value of the parameter is 0.00035 mm which is similar to the case of the rolling bearing with the logarithmic profile [5,12,14].

The new geometry of the rolling bearing composed by the logarithmic curve increases total carrying capacity, and thus, bearing durability by more than 25 per cent. This new geometry does not form strain peaks that negatively affect total bearing durability.

 

 

Fig. 5. The comparison of calculated lifetimes of analysed geometries

 

 

Acknowledgement

 

This work was supported by Grant system of the University of Zilina and the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport under the contract No. 1/0595/18 – “Optimising the internal geometry of roller bearings with line contact in order to increase their durability and reduce their structural weight”.

 

 

References

 

1.      Bartnik Grzegorz, Zbigniew Krzysiak, Waldemar Samociuk, Grzegorz Lysiak, Krzysztof Plizga, Marek Szmigielski, Aleksander Nieoczym, Zdzislaw Kaliniewicz, Frantisek Brumercik. 2017. “Documentation of meeting the requirements in the area of technical safety on the example of distribution of liquid fuels”. Przemysl Chemiczny 96(5): 1039-1041. ISSN 0033-2496.

2.      Caban J., A. Marczuk, B. Sarkan, J. Vrabel. 2015. “Studies on operational wear of glycol-based brake fluid”. Przemysł Chemiczny 94(10): 1802-1806. ISSN 0033-2496.

3.      Czech Piotr. 2012. „Determination of the course of pressure in an internal combustion engine cylinder with the use of vibration effects and radial basis function - preliminary research”. Communications in Computer and Information Science 329: 175-182. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34050-5_21. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. ISBN:978-3-642-34049-9. ISSN: 1865-0929. In: Mikulski Jerzy (eds), Telematics in the transport environment, 12th International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics, Katowice Ustron, Poland, October 10-13, 2012.

4.      Czech Piotr. 2011. „Diagnosing of disturbances in the ignition system by vibroacoustic signals and radial basis function - preliminary research”. Communications in Computer and Information Science 239: 110-117. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24660-9_13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. ISBN:978-3-642-24659-3. ISSN: 1865-0929. In: Mikulski Jerzy (eds), Modern transport telematics, 11th International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics, Katowice Ustron, Poland, October 19-22, 2011.

5.      Drozdziel P., L. Krzywonos. 2009. “The Estimation of the Reliability of the First Daily Diesel Engine Start-up During its Operation in the Vehicle”. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 1(41): 4-10. ISSN 1507-2711.

6.      Figlus Tomasz. 2019. “A method for diagnosing gearboxes of means of transport using multi-stage filtering and entropy”. Entropy 21(5): 1-13. ISSN 1099-4300, DOI: 10.3390/e21050441.

7.      Figlus Tomasz, Mateusz Koziol. 2016. “Diagnosis of early-stage damage to polymer - glass fibre composites using non-contact measurement of vibration signals”. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30(8): 3567-3576. ISSN: 1738-494X. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-0717-1.

8.      Jedlinski L., J. Caban, L. Krzywonos, S. Wierzbicki, F. Brumercik. 2015. “Application of vibration signal in the diagnosis of IC engine valve clearance”. Journal of vibroengineering 17(1): 175-187. ISSN 1392-8716.

9.      Kohár R., F. Brumerčík, M. Lukáč, A. Nieoczym. 2016. „Numerical analysis of roller bearing“.Applied computer science 12(1): 5-16. ISSN 1895-3735.

10.  Krzysiak Zbigniew, Grzegorz Bartnik, Waldemar Samociuk, Janusz Zarajczyk, Krzysztof Plizga, Bartlomiej Rachwal, Slawomir Wierzbicki, Leszek Krzywonos, Frantisek Brumercik. 2017. “Analysis of explosion hazard at the liquid fuel station”. Przemysl Chemiczny 96(2): 279-282. ISSN 0033-2496.

11.  Mitka M., R. Bastovansky, F. Brumercik, P. Ignaciuk. 2017. “Local resistance of heating molybdenum sheet in a test device”. Advances in science and technology-research journal 11(3): 87-93. ISSN 2299-8624.

12.  Mruzek Martin, Igor Gajdáč, Ľuboš Kučera, Dalibor Barta. 2016. „Analysis of parameters influencing electric vehicle range“. Procedia Engineering 134: 165-174. ISSN 1877-7058.

13.  Mruzek Martin, Igor Gajdáč, Ľuboš Kučera, Tomáš Gajdošík. 2017. „The possibilities of increasing the electric vehicle range“. Procedia Engineering 192: 621-625. ISSN 1877-7058.

14.  Tomasikova M., M. Tropp, T. Gajdosik, L. Krzywonos, F. Brumercik. 2017. „Analysis of transport mechatronic system properties”. 12th International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists on Sustainable, Modern and Safe Transport. Procedia Engineering 192: 881-886. High Tatras, Slovakia, May 31-Jun 02, 2017. ISSN 1877-7058.

 

 

Received 18.10.2019; accepted in revised form 22.12.2019

 

Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License



[1] Institute of Competitiveness and Innovations, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, Žilina 01008,
Slovak Republic. Email: jan.steininger@fstroj.uniza.sk

[2] Department of design and mechanical elements, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, Žilina 01008,
Slovak Republic. Email: slavomir.hrcek@fstroj.uniza.sk

[3] Department of design and mechanical elements, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, Žilina 01008,
Slovak Republic. Email: lukas.smetanka@fstroj.uniza.sk

[4] Department of design and mechanical elements, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, Žilina 01008,
Slovak Republic. Email: rudolf.skyba@fstroj.uniza.sk